Wednesday, February 26, 2014

ID might be wrong, but not the way you think

http://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2014/02/occasionalism-intelligent-design-and-the-myth-of-secondary-causation
Posted by at
Labels: , , ,

1 comment:

  1. Andrew2/27/2014 6:55 AM

    A friend of mine wrote a reply that gets to the heart of the problem with some Thomistic critiques of ID arguments: http://simplyphilosophy.org/feser-and-intelligent-design/

    In reality the classical design argument and the ID arguments are completely compatible.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)